Status: In Messages (date/time TBD)
Action: Contact your House member and urge a NO vote if/when it is calendared.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 429

I’m urging you to vote NO on HB 429.

HB 429 would expand how law enforcement can designate someone as a “gang member,” including by citing “gang-related language” on social media. This risks overreach, mislabeling, and discriminatory enforcement and can have life-altering consequences in charging and sentencing.

Please vote NO on HB 429 and protect due process and civil liberties.

Next committee: Justice Appropriations Subcommittee (date/time TBD)
Action: Call/email members ahead of the hearing and urge a NO vote.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 485

I’m urging you to vote NO on HB 485.

HB 485 would allow a domestic violence injunction against a spouse based on an allegation of “marriage fraud,” and then require courts to immediately alert immigration authorities. This invites misuse in messy disputes and turns civil injunctions into an immigration reporting pipeline.

Domestic violence protections should focus on safety and evidence-based standards, not expand into immigration enforcement.

Please vote NO on HB 485.

Next committee: House State Affairs Committee (date/time TBD)
Action: Contact members before the hearing and urge a NO vote.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 1551

I’m urging you to vote NO on HB 1551.

HB 1551 would make it harder for injured people and families to hold a gun manufacturer accountable when a pistol allegedly fires without a trigger pull. When a product fails in a way that can kill or seriously injure someone, Floridians should be able to seek accountability through the courts.

Please vote NO on HB 1551.

Next committee: Senate Rules (date/time TBD)
Action: Contact committee members and urge a NO vote.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 838

I’m urging you to vote NO on SB 838.

SB 838 would allow auto lenders to add “processing fees” when borrowers make payments by credit card or other electronic methods. This creates a junk-fee pathway that punishes people for paying on time using modern payment systems.

Please vote NO on SB 838 and protect consumers from unnecessary add-on fees.

Next committee: Senate GOA (date/time TBD)
Action: Contact committee members and urge a NO vote.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1236

I’m urging you to vote NO on SB 1236.

SB 1236 would prohibit companies receiving state incentives from voluntarily recognizing a union or agreeing to remain neutral during a union election. This is government interference that tips the scale against workers—especially at companies benefiting from public dollars.

Please vote NO on SB 1236.

Status: Postponed in GOA (date/time TBD)
Action: Contact GOA members anyway—postponed bills often return with short notice.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1296

I’m asking you to vote NO on SB 1296.

SB 1296 would make it harder for teachers, clerks, bus drivers, and other public-sector workers to unionize and advocate for safe working conditions and fair pay. This weakens essential services by increasing turnover and silencing the people who keep our communities running.

Please vote NO on SB 1296.

Last action: Passed Ethics & Elections (5–2) on Feb 4, 2026
Next committee: Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development (ATD) (date/time TBD)
Action: Contact committee members before the hearing and urge a NO vote.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1334 — Protect access to voter registration

I am urging you to vote NO on SB 1334.

SB 1334 makes significant changes to Florida’s election and voter registration laws that risk creating new barriers for eligible voters. Requiring citizenship verification through DHSMV before an online registration can even be reviewed by a Supervisor of Elections increases the risk of errors, delays, and wrongful rejections.

The bill also alters voter registration oath language and allows retroactive changes to voter records, creating uncertainty and the potential for eligible voters to be flagged or removed without clear notice.

Florida should be strengthening access to accurate and secure voter registration—not adding bureaucratic obstacles that disproportionately impact students, seniors, naturalized citizens, and voters who have recently moved or changed their names.

Please vote NO on SB 1334 and protect Floridians’ freedom to register and vote.

Harm: Undermines local democracy and invites intimidation lawsuits against community standards.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 105 — Protect local control and community standards

HB 105 would empower businesses to sue in order to stop local governments from enforcing local rules and ordinances.

This undermines local democracy and makes it harder for communities to address real local needs—from safety and consumer protections to quality-of-life rules.

Please oppose HB 105 and defend the ability of cities and counties to govern locally, transparently, and in the public interest.

Harm: Leaves families and communities without recourse after contamination.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 167 — Do not shield phosphate mining companies from accountability

I am writing as a Florida resident to urge you to oppose HB 167.

HB 167 makes it harder for Floridians to hold phosphate mining companies accountable for radiation exposure and contamination risks on redeveloped land. Families should not lose their right to seek justice when they are harmed—especially when the harms involve long-term health risks and environmental contamination.

Please oppose HB 167 and protect Floridians’ right to accountability, transparency, and safety.

Harm: Risks teen health, increases preventable pregnancies/infections, strips medical privacy.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 173 — Protect teen health and medical privacy

I am writing as a Florida resident to urge you to oppose HB 173.

HB 173 would block teens from accessing birth control and STI testing/treatment without parental permission. This risks teen health, increases preventable infections and unintended pregnancies, and undermines medical privacy.

Please oppose HB 173.

Harm: Invites exploitation by creating a loophole to underpay people doing real work.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 221 — Do not weaken Florida’s minimum wage protections

HB 221 would allow employers to pay less than minimum wage to apprentices, interns, and similar workers.

That invites exploitation and turns “training” into a loophole to underpay people doing real work. Please oppose HB 221 and protect Florida’s minimum wage standards.

Harm: Corporate carve-out that can increase youth nicotine access and lower state revenue.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 377 — No tobacco tax carve-out for heated products

HB 377 would exempt heated tobacco products from Florida’s tobacco taxes—a special carve-out that benefits major tobacco corporations such as Philip Morris (IQOS).

Florida should not make nicotine products cheaper or easier to market through tax loopholes. Please oppose HB 377.

Harm: Can accelerate sprawl, increase infrastructure costs, and worsen flooding/traffic.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 399 — Don’t accelerate sprawl and infrastructure costs

HB 399 would eliminate a key development restriction meant to slow suburban sprawl.

Sprawl can push growth outward without adequate infrastructure, increasing long-term costs for roads, drainage, schools, and emergency services while worsening traffic and flood risk.

Please oppose HB 399 and support responsible planning that protects communities and taxpayers.

Harm: Risks sprawl and water/infrastructure strain if local planning authority is weakened.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 691 — Protect farmland, water, and responsible growth

HB 691 would make it easier to develop residential subdivisions on farmland next to urbanized areas.

Florida’s growth must be planned with water supply, flooding, transportation, and public services in mind. Weakening safeguards can accelerate sprawl and increase taxpayer costs.

Please oppose HB 691 or amend it to preserve meaningful local planning authority and infrastructure protections.

Harm: Paperwork barriers often cut eligible families off care and food support.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 693 — Don’t add barriers to healthcare and food assistance

HB 693 would impose new eligibility restrictions for Medicaid and KidsCare and add additional paperwork requirements for SNAP.

Administrative hurdles often cause eligible families to lose coverage or food assistance. Please oppose HB 693 and protect access to healthcare and basic nutrition support for eligible Floridians.

Harm: Overrides local control of locally owned public infrastructure.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 919 — Keep airport naming decisions local

HB 919 would remove local authority to name major airports and impose a state-directed rename of Palm Beach International Airport.

Local public infrastructure should be governed locally. Please oppose HB 919.

Action: Share your support/concerns and request a transparent, science-based plan.

Subject: HB 981 — Please support a science-based plan for the Ocklawaha River

HB 981 requires DEP to prepare a plan to breach Rodman Dam and restore the natural flow of the Ocklawaha River.

I support a transparent, science-based process that evaluates ecological restoration, water quality, habitat, recreation, and long-term public benefits with meaningful public input.

Please support HB 981 and ensure the plan is rigorous and transparent.

Harm: Weakens workers’ freedom of association and destabilizes essential public services.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 995 — Protect workers’ right to organize

HB 995 would make it harder for many public-sector workers—including teachers, clerks, and bus drivers—to unionize and maintain representation.

Workers’ ability to organize is a basic democratic right that supports safe workplaces and stable services. Please oppose HB 995.

Harm: Politicizes health education; schools should use medically accurate, age-appropriate curriculum.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 1071 — Keep health education medically accurate and age-appropriate

HB 1071 would require public schools to show students an anti-abortion cartoon as part of health education beginning in sixth grade.

Health education should be medically accurate and age-appropriate—not political messaging. Please oppose HB 1071.

Harm: Supercharges censorship and undermines professional educational review.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 1119 — Stop forced book bans and censorship

HB 1119 would forbid school districts from considering a book’s literary or artistic merit when responding to challenges. This replaces thoughtful review with censorship pressure.

Please oppose HB 1119 and protect honest education and students’ access to age-appropriate literature.

Harm: Chills local governments from managing growth responsibly and shifts costs to taxpayers.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 1139 — Don’t shift developer legal costs onto taxpayers

HB 1139 would require local governments to pay a developer’s attorney fees if the developer wins a case over impact fees.

This pressures communities to back down from reasonable infrastructure funding decisions. Please oppose HB 1139 and protect local taxpayers.

Action: Ask for evidence-based policy and a clear financial/academic impact analysis.

Subject: HB 1279 — Please consider impacts on university quality and finances

HB 1279 would cap out-of-state freshmen admissions at 5% at UF and other top public universities.

If Florida changes admissions policy, it should be done with careful analysis of financial impacts, academic competitiveness, research capacity, and campus diversity—not a blunt instrument.

Please ensure any action is evidence-based and protects university excellence while prioritizing Floridians.

Harm: Risks ecological impacts and shifts public conservation lands toward private commercial use.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 1421 — Keep conservation lands for conservation

HB 1421 would direct agencies to study cattle grazing on conservation lands and lease lands deemed feasible to private cattle companies.

Conservation lands are managed to protect habitat, water resources, and public benefit. Expanding private grazing risks ecological impacts and undermines conservation purpose.

Please oppose HB 1421 or ensure conservation protections remain primary and enforceable.

Action: If you support/oppose, ask for rigorous independent safety review and transparent oversight.

Subject: HB 1461 — Please ensure safety, transparency, and strong oversight

HB 1461 establishes a regulatory framework authorizing deployment of advanced nuclear reactors.

Any move toward new reactor technologies must include rigorous independent safety review, clear waste handling plans, strong emergency planning, and transparent public oversight.

Please ensure HB 1461 prioritizes safety, accountability, and public input.

Harm: High risk of political misuse without strict due process, clear standards, and transparency.

Subject: Vote NO on HB 1471 — Protect civil liberties and due process

HB 1471 would empower state authorities to designate and sanction “domestic terrorist organizations.”

Any system that labels groups and triggers penalties must include strong due process, clear standards, transparency, and safeguards against political misuse. Without that, it risks chilling lawful speech and association.

Please oppose HB 1471 or demand robust protections that prevent overreach.

Harm: Mandatory sentencing removes judicial discretion and can produce unjust outcomes.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 156 — Reject mandatory life sentencing

SB 156 would mandate life sentences for anyone convicted of manslaughter who inadvertently kills a police officer.

Mandatory life sentencing removes judicial discretion and ignores circumstances. Florida’s laws should allow judges to consider facts and evidence—not impose one-size-fits-all punishments.

Please oppose SB 156.

Harm: Risks IVF, miscarriage care, and medical privacy by injecting courts into healthcare.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 164 — Protect IVF, miscarriage care, and medical privacy

SB 164 would grant fertilized eggs legal rights similar to living children and invite lawsuits from the moment of conception.

This threatens IVF, miscarriage management, and care for pregnancy complications by injecting legal risk into medical decisions.

Please oppose SB 164 and protect evidence-based reproductive healthcare and privacy.

Harm: Can chill speech and intimidate watchdogs with expensive lawsuits.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 290 — Protect free speech and watchdog accountability

SB 290 would make it easier for powerful sugar companies to sue environmental groups, journalists, and food-safety advocates for defamation.

This invites intimidation lawsuits that can silence criticism and discourage public-interest reporting. Please oppose SB 290.

Harm: Weakens sunshine oversight in decisions that can affect taxpayers and zoning.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 332 — Keep public settlement discussions transparent

SB 332 would expand the ability of attorneys and governments to meet in secret to discuss settlements under Bert Harris claims.

When negotiations can affect taxpayers and community planning, the public deserves transparency. Please oppose SB 332 and protect sunshine principles.

Action: If you oppose, emphasize problem-gambling safeguards and consumer protections.

Subject: SB 530 — Please prioritize safeguards before expanding lottery vending purchases

SB 530 would allow debit cards to be used to buy lottery tickets from vending machines.

Making gambling frictionless can increase impulsive purchases. If Florida expands access, it should include strong safeguards and consumer protections.

Please oppose SB 530 or amend it to add meaningful safeguards.

Harm: Overrides local control of locally owned public infrastructure.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 706 — Keep airport naming decisions local

SB 706 would take airport naming authority away from the cities and counties that own them and impose a state-directed rename.

These are locally owned public assets. Please oppose SB 706 and protect local control.

Concern: Affordability matters, but sweeping overrides can ignore infrastructure and neighborhood context.

Subject: SB 948 — Please protect local planning and infrastructure needs

SB 948 (“Starter Homes Act”) would force higher density and make it harder for communities to manage it through height, setbacks, parking, and lot-size rules.

Florida needs more affordable housing, but state overrides must not ignore infrastructure capacity, stormwater, traffic, and neighborhood safety.

Please oppose SB 948 as written or amend it to preserve meaningful local planning authority and infrastructure standards.

Harm: Exposes public reserves to speculative volatility and fraud risk.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1038 — Do not invest taxpayer funds in cryptocurrency

SB 1038 would establish rules for a state reserve fund that invests taxpayer money in cryptocurrency.

Crypto markets are volatile and have a long record of fraud and extreme price swings. Public funds exist for stability—not speculation.

Please oppose SB 1038 and keep Florida’s public reserves invested conservatively and transparently.

Harm: Creates a mechanism to expose state reserves to unnecessary risk.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1040 — Reject a state cryptocurrency reserve fund

SB 1040 would create a cryptocurrency reserve fund.

This exposes public reserves to speculative volatility and risks losses that ultimately fall on taxpayers. Please oppose SB 1040.

Concern: Tax breaks should include transparency, performance metrics, and clawbacks.

Subject: SB 1512 — Require accountability and transparency for corporate tax breaks

SB 1512 would expand tax breaks that aerospace, defense, and other companies can receive through Space Florida.

If Florida offers subsidies, taxpayers deserve transparency, performance metrics, and enforceable clawbacks if promised jobs or investments do not materialize.

Please oppose SB 1512 as written or amend it to require strong public accountability.

Harm: Strips local tools to address climate risk, resilience, and energy choices.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1628 — Let communities address climate risk and energy policy

SB 1628 would prevent communities from implementing policies meant to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change, and it would eliminate local green energy policies already on the books.

Florida communities face real climate and resilience challenges. Local governments need flexibility to plan and protect residents. Please oppose SB 1628.

Harm: Undermines public health safeguards and removes accountability for harms.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1756 — Protect public health and medical accountability

SB 1756 would allow parents to bypass school immunization requirements for reasons of “conscience,” and would allow ivermectin sales without a prescription while granting immunity from lawsuits over negative health effects.

Weakening vaccination requirements increases outbreak risk and puts vulnerable children at risk. Please oppose SB 1756.

How to use: Copy the script and send it or read it. Include your city + ZIP.

Subject: Oppose partisan redistricting in Florida

I am writing as a Florida voter to express my strong opposition to the current redistricting efforts underway in our state.

Redistricting should serve voters—not political parties or those already in power. Florida’s Constitution is clear that districts must not be drawn to favor or disfavor a political party or incumbent and must respect communities of interest.

I urge you to oppose any redistricting plan that prioritizes political gain over fair representation and instead support transparent, constitutional maps that reflect Florida’s diverse communities.

How to use: Copy the script and paste it or read it. Include your city + ZIP.

Subject: Oppose the SAVE Act — Protect the freedom to vote

I am writing as a constituent to urge you to oppose the so-called SAVE Act.

While presented as an election security measure, the SAVE Act would create significant new barriers to voter registration for millions of eligible Americans. Requiring specific citizenship documents to register or update registration would disproportionately harm seniors, students, rural voters, married women who have changed their names, and working people who do not have ready access to these documents.

There is no evidence of widespread non-citizen voting that would justify these restrictions. Instead, the SAVE Act would disenfranchise eligible voters and undermine the fundamental right to vote.

Please oppose the SAVE Act and reject any legislation that restricts lawful voter registration or participation.

How to use: Copy the script and paste it or read it. Include your city + ZIP.

Subject: Refuse DHS funding that fails to rein in ICE and Border Patrol (FY2026)

I urge you to refuse to vote for any appropriations bill for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that fails to rein in ICE and Border Patrol and protect our communities.

The killing of Renee Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026 underscores what happens when federal immigration enforcement operates without meaningful restrictions and accountability. Congress must use the appropriations process to set enforceable limits before approving any funding.

As a member of Congress, you have the power to curb abuse and protect the public by:
• Refusing to vote for any FY2026 appropriations bill that includes increased funding for ICE or Border Patrol, including funds for detention; and
• Refusing to vote for any DHS funding bill unless it:
  1) Strengthens restrictions on ICE and Border Patrol’s ability to conduct dragnet arrest operations and target people based on race, language or accent, place of employment, or location at the time of apprehension;
  2) Ends Border Patrol deployment to our cities and rejects its ever-expanding mandate in immigration enforcement; and
  3) Limits DHS’s reprogramming and transfer authority—specifically preventing the reprogramming or transferring of funds for detention.

Please insist on real limits and accountability before any DHS funding is approved.